Chapter 97
3., and Boyer's History of William, 1702. Narcissus Luttrell repeatedly, and even as late as the close of 1692, speaks of Nottingham as likely to be Chancellor.]
[Footnote 22: Roger North relates an amusing story about Shaftesbury's embarra.s.sments.]
[Footnote 23: London Gazette March 4. 1688/9]
[Footnote 24: Burnet ii. 5.]
[Footnote 25: The Protestant Mask taken off from the Jesuited Englishman, 1692.]
[Footnote 26: These appointments were not announced in the Gazette till the 6th of May; but some of them were made earlier.]
[Footnote 27: Kennet's Funeral Sermon on the first Duke of Devons.h.i.+re, and Memoirs of the Family of Cavendish, 1708.]
[Footnote 28: See a poem ent.i.tled, A Votive Tablet to the King and Queen.]
[Footnote 29: See Prior's Dedication of his Poems to Dorset's son and successor, and Dryden's Essay on Satire prefixed to the Translations from Juvenal. There is a bitter sneer on Dryden's effeminate querulousness in Collier's Short View of the Stage. In Blackmore's Prince Arthur, a poem which, worthless as it is, contains some curious allusions to contemporary men and events, are the following lines:
"The poets' nation did obsequious wait For the kind dole divided at his gate.
Laurus among the meagre crowd appeared, An old, revolted, unbelieving bard, Who thronged, and shoved, and pressed, and would be heard.
Sakil's high roof, the Muses' palace, rung With endless cries, and endless sons he sung.
To bless good Sakil Laurus would be first; But Sakil's prince and Sakil's G.o.d he curst.
Sakil without distinction threw his bread, Despised the flatterer, but the poet fed."
I need not say that Sakil is Sackville, or that Laurus is a translation of the famous nickname Bayes.]
[Footnote 30: Scarcely any man of that age is more frequently mentioned in pamphlets and satires than Howe. In the famous pet.i.tion of Legion, he is designated as "that impudent scandal of Parliaments." Mackay's account of him is curious. In a poem written in 1690, which I have never seen except in ma.n.u.script, are the following lines:
"First for Jack Howe with his terrible talent, Happy the female that scopes his lampoon; Against the ladies excessively valiant, But very respectful to a Dragoon."]
[Footnote 31: Sprat's True Account; North's Examen; Letter to Chief Justice Holt, 1694; Letter to Secretary Trenchard, 1694.]
[Footnote 32: Van Citters, Feb 19/March 1 1688/9]
[Footnote 33: Stat. I W.&M. sess. i. c. I. See the Journals of the two Houses, and Grey's Debates. The argument in favour of the bill is well stated in the Paris Gazettes of March 5. and 12. 1689.]
[Footnote 34: Both Van Citters and Ronquillo mention the anxiety which was felt in London till the result was known.]
[Footnote 35: Lords' Journals, March 1688/9]
[Footnote 36: See the letters of Rochester and of Lady Ranelagh to Burnet on this occasion.]
[Footnote 37: Journals of the Commons, March 2. 1688/9 Ronquillo wrote as follows: "Es de gran consideracion que Seimor haya tomado el juramento; porque es el arrengador y el director princ.i.p.al, en la casa de los Comunes, de los Anglicanos." March 8/18 1688/9]
[Footnote 38: Grey's Debates, Feb. 25, 26, and 27. 1688/9]
[Footnote 39: Commons' Journals, and Grey's Debates, March 1. 1688/9]
[Footnote 40: I W. & M.
[Footnote 41: Commons' Journals, March 15. 1688/9 So late as 1713, Arbuthnot, in the fifth part of John Bull, alluded to this transaction with much pleasantry. "As to your Venire Facias," says John to Nick Frog, "I have paid you for one already."]
[Footnote 42: Wagenaar, lxi.]
[Footnote 43: Commons' Journals, March 15. 1688/9.]
[Footnote 44: Reresby's Memoirs.]
[Footnote 45: Commons' Journals, and Grey's Debates, March 15. 1688/9; London Gazette, March 18.]
[Footnote 46: As to the state of this region in the latter part of the seventeenth and the earlier part of the eighteenth century, see Pepys's Diary, Sept. 18. 1663, and the Tour through the whole Island of Great Britain, 1724.]
[Footnote 47: London Gazette, March 25. 1689; Van Citters to the States General, March 22/April 1 Letters of Nottingham in the State Paper Office, dated July 23 and August 9. 1689; Historical Record of the First Regiment of Foot, printed by authority. See also a curious digression in the Compleat History of the Life and Military Actions of Richard, Earl of Tyrconnel, 1689.]
[Footnote 48: Stat. I W.&M. sess. I. c. 5.; Commons' Journals, March 28.
1689.]
[Footnote 49: Stat. I W.& M. sess. I. c. 2.]
[Footnote 50: Ronquillo, March 8/18. 1689.]
[Footnote 51: See the account given in Spence's Anecdotes of the Origin of Dryden's Medal.]
[Footnote 52: Guardian, No. 67.]
[Footnote 53: There is abundant proof that William, though a very affectionate, was not always a polite husband. But no credit is due to the story contained in the letter which Dalrymple was foolish enough to publish as Nottingham's in 1773, and wise enough to omit in the edition of 1790. How any person who knew any thing of the history of those times could be so strangely deceived, it is not easy to understand particularly as the handwriting bears no resemblance to Nottingham's, with which Dalrymple was familiar. The letter is evidently a common newsletter, written by a scribbler, who had never seen the King and Queen except at some public place, and whose anecdotes of their private life rested on no better authority than coffeehouse gossip.]
[Footnote 54: Ronquillo; Burnet, ii. 2.; d.u.c.h.ess of Marlborough's Vindication. In a pastoral dialogue between Philander and Palaemon, published in 1691, the dislike with which women of fas.h.i.+on regarded William is mentioned. Philander says
"But man methinks his reason should recall, Nor let frail woman work his second fall."]
[Footnote 55: Tutchin's Observator of November 16. 1706.]
[Footnote 56: Prior, who was treated by William with much kindness, and who was very grateful for it, informs us that the King did not understand poetical eulogy. The pa.s.sage is in a highly curious ma.n.u.script, the property of Lord Lansdowne.]
[Footnote 57: Memoires originaux sur le regne et la cour de Frederic I, Roi de Prusse, ecrits par Christophe Comte de Dohna. Berlin, 1833. It is strange that this interesting volume should be almost unknown in England. The only copy that I have ever seen of it was kindly given to me by Sir Robert Adair. "Le Roi," Dohna says, "avoit une autre qualite tres estimable, qui est celle de n'aimer point qu'on rendit de mauvais offices a personne par des railleries." The Marquis de La Fork tried to entertain His Majesty at the expense of an English n.o.bleman. "Ce prince," says Dohna "prit son air severe, et, le regardant sans mot dire, lui fit rentrer les paroles dans le ventre. Le Marquis m'en fit ses plaintes quelques heures apres. 'J'ai mal pris ma bisque,' dit-il; 'j'ai cru faire l'agreable sur le chapitre de Milord.. mais j'ai trouva a qui parler, et j'ai attrape un regard du roi qui m'a fait pa.s.ser l'envie de tire.'" Dohna supposed that William might be less sensitive about the character of a Frenchman, and tried the experiment. But, says he, "j'eus a pert pres le meme sort que M. de la Foret."]
[Footnote 58: Compare the account of Mary by the Whig Burnet with the mention of her by the Tory Evelyn in his Diary, March 8. 1694/5, and with what is said of her by the Nonjuror who wrote the Letter to Archbishop Tennison on her death in 1695. The impression which the bluntness and reserve of William and the grace and gentleness of Mary had made on the populace may be traced in the remains of the street poetry of that time. The following conjugal dialogue may still be seen on the original broadside.
"Then bespoke Mary, our most royal Queen, 'My gracious king William, where are you going?'
He answered her quickly, 'I count him no man That telleth his secret unto a woman.'
The Queen with a modest behaviour replied, 'I wish that kind Providence may be thy guide, To keep thee from danger, my sovereign Lord, He which will the greatest of comfort afford.'"
These lines are in an excellent collection formed by Mr. Richard Heber, and now the property of Mr. Broderip, by whom it was kindly lent to me; in one of the most savage Jacobite pasquinades of 1689, William is described as
"A churle to his wife, which she makes but a jest."]
[Footnote 59: Burnet, ii. 2.; Burnet, MS. Harl. 6484. But Ronquillo's account is much more circ.u.mstantial. "Nada se ha visto mas desfigurado; y, quantas veces he estado con el, le he visto toser tanto que se le saltaban las lagrimas, y se ponia moxado y arrancando; y confiesan los medicos que es una asma incurable," Mar. 8/18 1689. Avaux wrote to the same effect from Ireland. "La sante de l'usurpateur est fort mauvaise.
L'on ne croit pas qu'il vive un an." April 8/18.]
[Footnote 60: "Hasta decir los mismos Hollandeses que lo desconozcan,"